Best sony ibis reddit. 8, and an adapted Canon FD 50mm f1.

Best sony ibis reddit I like the bigger screen, better viewfinder and more buttons. Posted by u/PhotosByDlee - 2 votes and 4 comments Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. The one I love the most for being stable with OSS and IBIS on full frame personally is: Zeiss Batis 85mm 1. Sony has some other options, they are a fair tad more expensive but can offer some good perks if you´re willing to pay. 8 (IBIS plus a non-stabilized lens) Sony FX6 + Sony G 24-105 F4 (no IBIS plus a stabilized lens) Which setup has the best stabilization in terms of handheld operation? I know that IBIS + stabilized lens would be the best option in terms of stabilization but I am trying to find out if the FX6 would be a good fit 11mm f1. 4 lenses are more than enough for low light, and IBIS should help mitigate the ZV-E10’s post-processing woes. I wrote an article a while back on which one is the best option, have a read on why I think that. I learned this the hard way with sigma 24-70 before getting the Sony 24-70 gmii using an fx3. IBIS only mainly helps you when standing still. For video? Yeah the ibis implementation with sigma and 3rd party lens are really shitty. This because IBIS is the mounting system for the sensor, the entirety of which is well behind the ND screen. So many people say that the ibis on the a6500 almost makes no difference, plus the screen dimming in 4k is a deal breaker imo. Thinking a 6100 or a6400, which don't have ibis. The A7III with the new sigma 100-400mm is a relatively ´cheap´ option with OIS and IBIS working together to give you very good reach and stability. IBIS alone would likely be enough to get me to buy it, especially if Sony ever implements the star tracking system like Pentax has. They’re all quite different. it just never seems to be able to stabilize a still scene even at shutter speeds under half a second. that's after 4 years of development. Is IBIS in A6700 improved over the A6500? comment sorted by Best Top New (Sony A6400 Lens-wise, I'd put Fuji's prime lenses juuuust slightly above Sony's G Master primes but at that point, it's pretty subjective. If you have some specific requirements or if it is critically important to have the best possible ibis then maybe you should compare it to other brands. I want to take low light and mountain landscape photos, but would use the lens also for just ordinary photos of friends. the main advantage is that the lenses and body would be much cheaper of course. I got the 6500 instead of the 6300 mainly because of IBIS, even though my lens has OSS. However if you are only doing stills at shutters at 1/60 or faster the OSS will not add much to your images. These follow into the not-so-expensive category priced below $300. Was actually looking for used A6600 or A7 iii, but this deal was very good for a new cam! The ibis on all sony cameras that have it is good. With the a6400 you'll get virtually same color science as the Sony a7iii, upgraded autofocus, and increased processor performance. 8 pancake, Sigma 60mm f2. I know that Sony is basically the second-largest camera brand and will continue to produce cameras for decades to come. especially with sony's abysmal firmware support. I find that image stabilization is a nice tool to have, but is seldom essential. 8 just before the Batis). - Sony 24-70mm f 2. Some complain about the color but it seems to be at a decent level with the newest Sonys. The fx30 isn’t terrible, but it just isn’t as good as Panasonics ibis wizardry Clean picture- they’re both super sharp and create a great picture. The a6400 supposedly has better focus tracking on moving objects, but if the lack of IBIS makes up for that, I'll stick with the a6500. 8. Post reviews, articles, and videos of products, unboxings, etc. Generally Sony’s IBIS isn’t great. ) The best 3 that you’ve picked here are the a7III, GH5 and ZV-1. 5, it does not and that's specifically because the sensor can't be moved enough to compensate for the sway. I found that the OSS combination was about a stop better. So basically: Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. The best lens I feel is the Sigma 16mm f1. Digital cameras are a domain in which it's best to get the newest release. Sony has a lot more native glass options available now vs. IBIS/OS gains more importance as shutter speeds go down, which doesn't mix well with a dynamic activity like a band jamming. EDIT: I guess the Tamron has stabilization too, so it still wins for low light. it’s worser than the sony a7iv in lowlight. However may get a6600 which has IBIS. Good Sony/canon cameras with ibis under 1300 euro have IBIS, so I was going to get a Sony A6400 for sure. You can pair IBIS with a lens that has IS but that’s about it. I have been using the Sony A6400 for almost 2 years now. Or if nothing else, OSS lenses can sometimes outperform IBIS. The sensor would shift essentially. I have a6600 and while IBIS from either a camera or lens does help with recording in static position or very slow movement, it's still useless when you are walking around (and the awful rolling shutter doesn't help) I got A74 now and active stabilization is awesome for Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. 4 primes for the XT4 to see the system shine. I’ll do my best to address your values point by point: Ibis- s5iix is better, plain and simple. 8 as of now, which are quite a bit cheaper than even the lenses you mentioned as cheap and lightweight. These lenses are compact and lightweight. Some IBIS systems suffer from "warpy shit" on digital IS and/or with a wide angle lens. 8 : This one has a very good price and its 540 Grams what could be a nice pair to the ZV-E1. When to use IBIS-while handholding the camera When not to use IBIS- while on a tripod, monopod, glidecam, slider, or gimbal. the sony makes video look robotic and there is alot of warping around the edges of the frame mainly cos of the larger sensor. . Sigma 18-50 is basically the go to, all-in-one, no compromise lens for Sony APS-C in terms of speed, size, and weight (only missing IBIS, but a6700 has that built in). only 2 MP upgrade, not better ibis, one sd slot, no open gate recording, worse screen compared to competition. As the title suggests, I'd like to know how important IBIS is when shooting video. I would suggest this lens because Auto-Focus in this lens is too good and super fast. 8 Sony lens. 4 G lens, I only manage to handhold 1/4s down to 1/3s shutter speed for _reliable_ sharp images… The best options that are 20mm 1. Ever. The af on these lenses will be great. Feb 8, 2015 · Has anyone tested these three variations for stabilization? I have heard previously that typically In Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) such as on the A7II is often not as effective as in lens Optical SteadyShot (OSS) as seen in many E-mount lenses. In your case, the IBIS and lens IS will work together though. Oct 4, 2023 · has anyone tested this by comparing two lens of the same focal length, one with OSs and one without and see if OSs improves the already excellent ibis? Only a few OSs lens are supported like the 70-200mm gmii and 24-105mm. Generally speaking, comparing like-to-like, Tamron's lenses tend to be ~90-95% as good in terms of image quality (obviously very subjective, but first party glass is generally a little sharper), but 1/2 the weight and 1/2-1/3 of the price. I have an X-T4. Bought a 24-240 Sony as well. IBIS certainty helped with my manual lenses (you have to select focal length manually). Sony's lets the image move in a more natural way but with less stability. It’s not the best lens in the world, but it’s tiny, light, decent zoom range. This is why no cinema camera (even Sony FX6) offers IBIS. The value of IBIS depends on what you're shooting. The first time I tried using an adapted lens, the focal length for ibis defaulted to the minimum (8mm) which actually seemed to make things worse. I am considering going with the a7iv instead of the a7cii because the camera feels better in my hands. It’s definitely on my short list. I went from carrying 5 batteries with my a6000, to 3 on the a6400. The first model absolutely had a defective IBIS system - it was shaking my footage when turned on and looked worse all over. Members Online New Senua's Saga: Hellblade II Trailer I own both! They’re both fantastic cameras, but they both have flaws. I also have the 20mm f2. 8, which has OSS, and the Sony 85mm 1. Oss is good for video but for stills ibis has been more than enough. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. It is on the expensive side though and is huge. I shot this video a few years ago on an A7RIII, completely handheld. Questions: Will the Sony 24-105mm f/4. After thorough research, I am currently leaning towards the Sony FE 24-105 f/4 G OSS lens. With that said, you'll really want those 1. IBIS matters more for still cameras than it does for video, IMO. The first diagram in the Sony section says it best: OSS corrects for pitch and yaw while IBIS corrects for translation and camera rotation as well. My main concern is choosing a future-proof manufacturer. It looks like the A7III can stabilize the Sony lens with its IBIS. Very valid question, if you think of IBIS as a way to keep a lens in place, preventing small movements, through 'fluid motion', then you can also imagine the lens NOT being in place because it is still moving, so when you are trying to track a fast moving object (like a flying bird) you may well find your lens element(s) still moving, which obviously results in a failed shot. APS-C form factor and lenses are so much better for handheld video. the only things it has compared to, let's say, the x-s20, is better autofocus. Hm! I have an A7III which has in-body image stabilization. It is not a feature of the camera body. I did a test comparing a 300mm lens with IBIS only to a 300mm lens with IBIS and OSS. 8 : Probably the best option but pricey AND with 886 Grams its almost twice the weight of the ZV-E1 since I have not much experience maybe you know if this will be an issue or not - Tamron AF 28-75mm f2. Is the AI chip, better autofocus and IBIS worth skipping the a7iv and going with the a7cii? Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Panasonic’s is the best, followed by Olympus’s. Moving the stabilization from the lens to the camera saves weight and complexity in the lenses. Awesome thanks! Very helpful. So why no IBIS on the higher end Sony cameras? Guessing because traditional filmmakers tend to hate IBIS, much as they dislike Autofocus. An A6400 's 2019 technology will be seven years old at that point. Get the a7 III if you want top image quality, don’t care about size, and don’t want to edit. I believe the α7c has IBIS, which is somewhat more effective by itself (although you can use IBIS and a lens with OSS at the same time for additional effectiveness) and has gyroscopic data coding in the video that can be used for extra stabilization in post-production, and will support lenses with OSS or OSS and IBIS do work together. 4 that would benefit from the IBIS, and would really like the silent shutter, extra custom button, and improved overall performance of the A6500, but IBIS is the key reason I'd make the move. 8, and an adapted Canon FD 50mm f1. I have not regretted this decision at all. The S5's is better IMO, but the Sony is totally workable, especially if you're shooting log and grading after. Get the sony 18-105 for a decent stabilised zoom with a good range for video. however, the fx30 doesn’t have a good burst shot Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. For video, your best bet is a gimbal. the a6700 has ibis as well actually and full frame doesnt really make sense for me considering it tends to cost a significant amount more, especially the lenses. But you really can't go wrong with a Canon M50 mark ii or a Sony a6000/6100/6400/6600 I prefer Sigma myself but keep in mind - especially with APSC body and lenses. 4 . I sold my Sony gear and bought a X-E4. But what about IBIS + OSS? Is there a specific stop/shutter speed advantage for any of these? Nov 2, 2019 · Curious if anyone has any insight into the relative benefits of OSS and IBIS. 0 lens’ OSS stack with the IBIS of the camera body? I watched a video that mentioned that you should only have one or the other on, but the OSS is superior to Sony’s IBIS? Is this correct? Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. It's kinda what set Sony apart back then, besides things like eye proximity auto focus and other tech lifted from Sony's Minolta origins. R5 might be an option, but it's expensive, and 45 megapixels might be a tad too much for me - 33 MP of A7IV seems to be a sweet spot for me. I just bought one, my forst full frame, as price was 1300 bucks for a new one with 50f1. One more thing to consider if you shoot videos, none of the sony APSC cameras shoot 4k60p, which is a must these days. Canon has a class-leading IBIS. You are better off with the Sony at retail price. also, i don’t desperately need the 4k 120fps. I would say that the natural Fuji alternative to the Sony A6400 is the Fujil X-S10. For the Sony, you'll be fine using the regular G or third party lenses. But aside from that I wouldn't worry too much about it. In my life of handling several cameras I’ve previously shot with the Sony A7ii, A7iii, A7iv, A6600, A6700 (current camera), as well as mirrorless cameras from fujifilm, canon, Ricoh, lumix, and Nikon, and without a single doubt, Sony is the ONLY brand I have issues with in regards to their IBIS. Testing the IBIS on the A7CII with a Sony 24 1. Then for primes, you could get some of the sigma ones, or sony is making some pretty good ones Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I can shoot moving targets handheld at 600mm f/6. OSS is a stabilizing feature present in lenses. Having recently come from making just such a decision myself (Nikon Z6 or Sony A7iii) I decided on the Sony specifically because of the lenses. This is a subreddit to discuss new cameras and camera comparisons, camera lenses, gear and accessories. Sony A7sIII - IBIS test - Active stabilization comments sorted by Best Top New Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. the fuji ibis, while not as good as a gimbal will give u alot smoother shots then the sony. Thoughts? But personally, for a cheaper price, Id rather get a6400 which does everything else better (and comes with an ois lens which is almost as good as sony ibis tbh) and maybe buy like the sony 35 as a good prime with ois for video/photos. Sony IBIS works at 1 or 2 stops, but 5. If you combine the AF of Sony and IBIS of Lumix you get the perfect camera. Shutter speed has two floors; one is the shooters ability to hold the camera still, the other is the speed at which the subject moves. 8 apsc sounds perfect for vlogging, lightweight + good for low light & can make plenty of bokeh but Sony power zoom 10-20mmf4 has useful ability to control zoom remotely, here's how I used power zoom while reviewing larger full frame lens 16-35mmf4 pz, it's a good example but in reality not something I utilize often, so a lot depends on your needs - f4 aperture has less bokeh & not the Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. 24mm are a little bit out off the capabilities of the Sony ibis, so recommend stay below this for handheld, but since the 24-105 have oss its useful at 24mm for walking and has a good range for static shots. The Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K is able to record at 388 MB/s (3,104 mb/s) for long periods without overheating. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I was a Sony A6000 user and, like you, was tempted by moving to the Fuji system. Now I am deciding between Zeiss Batis 85mm 1. I jumped from an a6000 to an a7iii. While autofocus can simply be turned off, IBIS in Sony's cameras can never be fully deactivated. Though so is the Sony 70-200 f4, which is one stop slower but very nice in many other regards, and with my fancy new a7CII’s IBIS plus OSS might even make up for the missing stop. I have decided to either go for the Sony A7IV with its extensive E-mount ecosystem or pick the S5II with its L-mount. The other commenters are right tho—generally the OSS works better than the IBIS for these sony cameras, even on my A7iii. I am currently a full time freelancer using my Sony a7iii for mainly video and occasionally photos. That said, Sony’s IBIS also isn’t terrible. 8, which does not have OSS, for both photo and video. Should I get a camera with ibis? I have the a6300 and would easily sell it to upgrade to a body big enough to handle IBIS and some better processing (less rolling shutter, better heat management). Never. You have a great point about vintage lenses and a body with IBIS will definitely be the choice for those - although given that most vintage lenses are going to be full frame at that point it probably IS worth saving up for something in the a7iii range or above rather than an APS-C sensor body, and you can still use existing crop-sensor lenses in APS-C mode (or, depending on the lens, just I also suggest buying a camera with IBIS, which means no A6400. 8, 16-35 f4 pz, and the 20-70 f4. It's the kit lens replacement but much faster. Idk why but Sonys ibis seems to work better for Sony 1st party lens vs 3rd party. I am planning and wanting to upgrade my camera especially since I am needing to use 4K 60 FPS for my client work. Sony A7SIII + Sigma 24-70mm F2. It's not too long that the OSS can't keep up, and long enough that it can make a difference over IBIS alone (as I had the Sony 85mm 1. It may be several years till the next major upgrade, so the cost per year of ownership isn't outrageous. Saying that I have sold both and now have a camera with no ibis as actually don't like any ibis system for actual shooting. I own the 85mm batis and got it used for the price of a new sony 85mm f1. This is due to a solid mounting of the sensor to a peltier cooler. 4 lens and a sony camera. i’m in a kinda tough spot here especially coz i film video mainly outdoors and not in a professional indoor setup so it kinda contradicts the fx30’s usage purpose. The ZV-E10 with just gyro is still a bit lacking, especially at night (lots of warping/dancing lights), so I need something with both IBIS and gyro. IBIS is probably busted. Yes, all of those 2nd gen alpha slr/slt model had built in ibis. Only options are: -go to a Repair Shop and ask if they can replace it or contact Sony -buy a Replacement yourself and change it -people said that if you hit the Camera upside down on a table gently it works for a while (do this with caution tho) Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Its only real weaknesses are the inferior IBIS, and its photo resolution. The Sony IBIS is ok, pretty decent, but the S5's is better for sure. Yeah, get the kit dude. The system overall is much cheaper than canon and sony with lenses, it has IBIS, colors are great, flippy screen, etc. IBIS won't be much of a help in broad daylight but makes quite a difference in low light and video. On the other hand, R6's 20 MP isn't very Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I have owned the Panasonic s5 and an fx3 and preffered the FX3. AFAIK on shorter focal lengths, IBIS works great, the longer the focal length, the more effective in-lens IS gets. 4 and the Sony 30mm f1. I'd say people are rightly a little let down by this offering. On the flip side, Lumix cameras have fantastic IBIS and does pretty well in low light despite smaller senor. is the difference between full frame and apsc lowlight that different for me to go Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Sony’s is arguably the weakest, and it has something to do with the mount diameter I think. Long story short, Sony pioneered IBIS, but back then it was only 2 axis. it depends on the camera movement. Nikon, unless you want to adapt older glass (which I didn't want to do. I want to get the sigma 16 mm f 1. I've taken sharp handheld pictures slower than 1/10. It will be helpful. You can downvote all you want, but unless Sony engineers are fucking incompetent there is only one straight forward reason why their IBIS performs horrendously I tend to recommend the Olympus EM5 mark ii/iii/iv (whichever you can afford used). The new canon mirrorless has great IBIS and the videos are so clean, but I’m looking for a less expensive option and I love how Sony has sigma and tamron options w/o an adapter. The IBIS will fight against the gimbal. When doing travel videos, I'll be shooting handheld, and for other things I do locally I'll be shooting with a gimbal (probably). That 50 is a full frame lens, and in a crop camera is like a 75mm equiv, so that’s mostly portrait range (definitely not great for videos). However, with the Sony lenses it's amazing. I’ve been very disappointed with the stabilisation with my 24-70 sigma, best I can do is about 1/20, a quick comparison with my Sony 20mm G which is sharp to about 1/4s. And with stabilized lenses like sony’s OSS you can get properly smooth handheld video, because they work together very well. If you get the full frame sigmas mentioned below you'll need an adaptor and need to take the hit on autofocus. I love the sigmas but they aren't stabilised so won't be as smooth as the combo of IBIS and lens stabilisation Sony lenses get for handheld shooting. The gimbal is your IBIS, in fact, it’s better than your IBIS. Doing a search shows a lot of other people experiencing the same thing. IBIS + OSS does seem to improve stabilization a bit. The Sony/Sigma 1. But my question is will the Batis have better stabilization considering it has OSS? So, coming to my dilemma. Can the same be said of adapted f GX85 and GX99 (which I returned) has terrible autofocus, your keeper rate is going to be a lot less. With the Sony ZV-E1 I know that it is more of a "content creator" type of camera and the a7siii is a more professional camera. I mean, IBIS/OS is going to have limited capability shooting a band, anyway. A reddit community dedicated to Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice, the action/psychological horror game developed by Ninja Theory, released August 8th 2017. I've looked at dozens of web posts, articles, and YouTube videos trying to understand if Sony lenses with Optical Steady Shot (OSS) when paired with a Sony body with in-body image stabilization (IBIS) really produce better images than either image stabilization system working alone. OSS together IBIS does help for some video and stills. Sony has an advantage or is equal to Canon in other aspects apart from IBIS. Panasonic's attempt to have zero movement brings out the wobbly warp effect on corners. 3. Let's say Sony releases the A6700's successor in 2026. So the question is: How good is the built in Sony Alpha a6500 IBIS? Should I go for a Sony Alpha a6400 and be limited to OSS lenses only? No. im planning on the sigma 18-50 and the 11mm f1. I consider buying either a Sony A7IV or Canon R6. It's not mind blowing but does give you a bit of help. It also has another side bonus: I have vintage lenses that I can use in lower light scenarios because of IBIS Looking to compare the canon r6 mark ii with a Sony model, ideally less expensive. also the ibis (in body image stabilizer) on the fuji line of cameras is much better than the sony A7iv imo. The A6400 is better than the A7 II in every way except the IBIS. Ibis is fine with my sigma 105mm macro. There's also the Tamron 35-150 F/2-2. However, the a7cii has the ai chip, better autofocus and better IBIS. Some exceptions are some Sony's do fine with no warp but lacks in good IBIS, and Panasonic's is just legendary. Specifically, I'm wondering if I'm better off using my 18-135 OSS on an a6400 or an a6500, for kid's sports photography. In video it's basically non-existent. okbgvu ajqkk gpt vfyqu fvbdqo zudbqq cuit vyisci opqmsy yxtndtlz