Hevc x265 vs h265 reddit. Ive found it to be a good sweet spot.

Hevc x265 vs h265 reddit Sep 13, 2024 · Announcing the HEVC (H. Tons of "older" hardware (like 5 years old) can do H265. There is just no advantage to be had here. AV1 will by far take the longest, but it will give you a much smaller file size. efficiency. It depends. It seems like there's better MP4 support overall. 264 and h. There are many different factors in hevc too, and it all depends on the encoder. Just like h264 vs vp8 and h265 (hevc) vs vp9. This is absolute bollocks. The myth of "HEVC can halve the size of AVC encodes" has led to a swarm of very bad H265 micro encodes that lack enough bitrate and were full of artifacts. But really HEVC has been out for years and is the transition technology on the road to the new AVC-1 / AV-1 codec. 265 offer high quality per bit than x264. But the bitrate of the H265 NVEnc video is lower than the 264 one. All will give the same video quality. Vvc vs av1 is Google open source vs paid mpeg proprietary codec vvc (h266). H265 by nature is designed for streaming (the likes of Netflix, Disney+ and such) so the lower the bitrate the better the encoder actually becomes compared to H264. Select 60 as the frame rate. I think it really depends on your needs. and also if h265 is basically HEVC_NVENC for NVIDIA GPU acceleration. Even if it matched H265 the time trade off isn't The long answer is that x265 behaves VERY differently than x264. H265 isn't supported on ancient hardware. Does anyone have suggestions for which groups . H264 and H265 are the video codecs for the video track. 4GB x264 video will not look the same as a 700mb x265 video, x265 will look worse. Mostly. At high bitrates the difference becomes little to non existant. HEVC was not a standard 15 years ago. It will likely be in h264 or h265 for the codec. which one should look better? thx If you're doing a ton of editing with the footage, you might not have a smooth experience with H265 depending on what you're doing with it and on what hardware. . I think h266 might be the last codec that doesn't use neural net compression. H265 (don't wanna say "can't" be, but currently isn't able to be) transcoded on the fly. x265 is an open source, free implementation that conforms to the h265 standard mentioned above. I think h265 might be the last relevant patent encumbered codec. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now H. So there is no way of comparing as X264 and X265 are cpu encoding NVENC and AMD-VCE gpu encoding. But a ~2gb x265 Joybell release is gonna look way worse than an ~8gb x264 FGT copy. You will need to make sure that you either A have a more powerful playback device or B have a playback device with a dedicated HW decoder. In this case the x265 means the person reencoded the remux, lowering the quality, in order to make it h265 and lower the size. 265 video. But using it on Android devices and Android TV with HEVC x265 rips, its a hit or miss all the time. You set x265 to a very high quality metric at the expense of a ton of storage. 265 codecs. Vp9 is not. x265 (the open source encoder used by the community) isn’t as good (yet!) as the professional reference encoder. H265 is nearly the same file size and visually superior in every way and in a 5th the time to boot. Wrong. Remuxes are usually x265, because why not. If I am re-encoding from a TV rip/BD Rip, I usually use HEVC now since most hardware supports it now. Now, I know these are all the same codec. This is another huge bonus. 264 instead of H. Quality difference side-by-side wasn't noticeable to me. There was a time I grabbed 1080p x265 in just about 200mb but I understood the meaning of quality after seeing quality encodes. For example, to get a same PSNR (~40. 265 is the encoder. There is no proof that at high bitrates x265 easily outperforms x264. Neither will work well as H264 and H265 are codecs that are designed for video playback at a low file size. As I understand it, HEVC/h265/x265 cannot be streamed using mpeg-ts. It's particularly noticable in my anime collection, as I'm making a point of getting dual-audio h265 content where possible, and I've got various version labelled with x265, h265 and HEVC. So 4k hevc has better compression than 720p hevc. If you encode a video to both H264 and H265 using settings that produce similar results, the h265 file should be smaller. Firstly, whenever you re-encode something, it will always have some drawback; that's just how it is. AV1 is likely going to end up being slightly behind HEVC in raw performance That's only the current hardware encoded AV1 that is just behind software encoded x265 with archival settings (but much faster to encode and no Ip issues). General advice in this sub is slower encodes make smaller files. 6. H265 is a codec, its a type of compression. This is also true of H264 but moreso with H265/HEVC. For comparison vvc is 10 times more computational more intensive than hevc on encode and two times on decode. As u/spong_miester x265 at lower bit-rates is certainly more significant and will offer the best picture quality. Qualcomm (the second-biggest holder of HEVC patents) is trying hard to support HEVC and avoid supporting AV1 because they want those sweet, sweet HEVC royalties. Almost nothing had HEVC hardware decoding/encoding. What?! Slow X265 is faster then x264 and quality is the same. H265 10-bit for 1080p(/i) Blu Rays Best settings to encode a 4k HDR x265 10-bit . Remuxes of 1080p blurays are either MPEG-2, VC-1 or H264. Being jellyfin free and easy to install, it was my first option. I tried HEVC 10-bit x265 slow at RF 23, no filters, and got a 12GB file. I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the RF vs. If 10bit h264 or 10bit h265 makes a difference in Instagram, its maybe because the h265 video had a higher quality in general, so the transcoding turned out better. There's not usually much mention of 1080p x265, only 4k x265 or 1080p x264. Yes, that's basically correct. I can't remember if it was the PS5 or Apple something that doesn't adhere to the MKV spec properly so some MKVs have to be transcoded remuxed into MP4 but that's not a heavy task in most cases. It's supposed to be a replacement for the "old", but widely supported and used H264. That being said, if you can’t use HEVC for some reason, but have the ability to use vp9, use it! It’s dramatically better than x264 in most cases. It was developed as a successor to VP9 by the Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia), a consortium founded in 2015 that includes semiconductor firms, video on demand providers, video content producers, software development companies and web browser vendors. I think that x265 is the sweet spot. AV1. However, it also depends on resolution. 6/2. Just based on personal tests i'm still leaning that x265 is producing a higher quality output with 'Slow' preset and aq-mode=3 vs something like Preset 4 AV1 with equal bitrates. Decoding can be done on a single core CPU, but for a decent experience you'll want quad core or better. The quality between the two seems comparable. h. But it is tangentially related with context and a linked article and my compilation project should anyone care to easily and quickly catch up to all Tigole's releases (that I know of). x264 and x265 are the encoders (that's the difference between h. Intraframe means that the compression is done within the frame itself. That was wiered. Ya your CQ for 265 is way, way to high. It wasn't that long ago that x264 outperformed x265 at high bitrates! It has improved since then, but not that much. 26* vs x. I guess its because YouTube uses Googles own codec which is VP9. Considering the h265 file is less than half the size, it is undoubtably a better compression and on 90% of shots, RF18 looks the same on both. You will get about 10-15% smaller files for the same if not better quality. This is so widespread that one of the first google results I get when searching for the impact of preset and CRF is a comparison of file sizes for different presets. Look at it this way: Higher efficiency in x265 means that a 1GB x265 will look better than a 1GB x264 video. Which is better as output when As for CQ value, the default for x265 is 28, so start at that and work my way down in numbers. Jul 30, 2022 · x264 and x265 are open source encoder implementations of the H. 265 vs. 3MB vs 45. I tried the following two custom presets to encode a sample 60FPS HDR, 4K Video. Also, just because you have gear that can deal with H265 doesn't mean you can still shell out for HDD whenever you're low on space. Since updating my file renaming options, I've noticed that x265 encoded videos are getting either "HEVC" or "x265", while videos encoded in x264 seem to consistently only have "x264" in the filename. Feel free to prove me wrong but from what I've seen and been told it doesn't. IN a perfect world, you'd use an FFMPEG tool - maybe with a User interface (vs. 8MB RF 18 very slow vs RF 16 fast>> 67. Mint/FFmpeg/Shutter Encoder. My Mi Box S can even do HEVC 4K natively. I just went by the x265 documentation/Handbrake recommendations. Even most smart TVs have built in hardware H265 decoders right now based on that I've seen since they can do direct play H265 plex content with no transcoding Once most devices have AV1, I'll totally jump on board I've been doing a lot of experimentation with h. You can upload prores mov's (at least on YouTube) if you absolutely want the highest quality and don't care about file size. It means if you choose h265 preset slow CRF18 it's not the same quality than h265 preset medium CRF18. i would download the x264 because its size is larger, but i'm confused because of the 10bit/8bit stuff. People use H265 as gpu encoding and X265 is cpu encoding instead of writing it all out h265 = ( Nvenc HEVC , Nvenc x265) There's like 5 different ways to write the same thing and it differs on each program . mkv If you're shooting on a GoPro, ProRes is overkill. No my comment is not directly about the difference in quality. 265) hardware encoding forum preview! This is a feature that has received a lot of votes over the years and we couldn’t be more excited to start getting some feedback leading up to the general release. Experienced encoders don't care and just use whatever that suits their boat because well, it doesn't really matter much other than speed. 265" or "AVC vs. In addition to what shmushkan said, note that only the latest GPUs have full hardware acceleration for H. So no, a 1. I have performed multiple encode tests targeting an average bitrate and the relative filesize is almost always the same between H265 intel QSV and x265. I've heard a lot of conflicting information about what file and quality profiles should be downloaded to h265/hevc. 265 are both fine BUT, they come in a Ton of flavors. h266 is new now, but I don't think it will catch on even though I do like some of the methods patented. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break x265 10 bits is the best actually (2022)! Vastly superior than x264 and x265 8 bits, way more compatible than in the past (Youtube, Facebook, everybody accept those nowadays, most new players too) and the extra color space give you so much power on night and low light level scenes. I’m getting very good results from Videotoolbox on M1 iMac. i want to download a movie that has 2 options: x265 10bit (29. They are faster, meaning they have decent Real-time encoding performance. Because I had problems at first with the above plugin I also tried one, which uses handbrake to transcode ("Tdarr_Plugin_s7x9_winsome_h265_10bit"). I compared Jujutsu Kaisen's HEVC BDMV Remux release (~6 GB per episode) to an x265 encode (~400mb) and they looked pretty much identical to me. 265 video, it has nothing to do with NVENC. 265. The default is P6, the mediation is high quality, the multi-encoding is 1/4, and the main configuration is The rest can refer to NVIDIA's recommended settings: You'll need a way to convert the h265 into MPEG2 (the format of DVDs. Others say there's no difference at all. Question: I did some close up comparisons of the videos, and the quality of the x265 file is pretty comparable to what NVENC produced. To calculate, 15 years ago was 2008. 265 compression if my NAS' processor is only a 6 year N3060 dual celeron 1. 90% of what downloads is x265. I understand the HEVC is the best format in terms of retaining quality but how big of a drop is x265 HEVC/H. But there's some optimizations that you can make to grab as much grain as possible using x265. 265 files are created with x265. The ~8gb x264 and the ~5gb x265 will look pretty close. HEVC files play file in any other player. x265 10-bit veryslow vs slower vs slow I made the mistake of encoding my whole library with x264 10-bit, so now I need to re-encode all of it. Realistically HEVC offers roughly a 30% improvement over AVC, so a ~5gb x265 movie is probably comparable to an 8gb x264 encode of the same movie, even moreso if the latter was just done on defaults. It is not reencoded compared to the bluray, its the same thing but as an mkv. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). I have been experimenting to find the best possible way through handbrake. HEVC MP4/MKV is better quality at the same bitrate as an AVC MP4/MKV. x264 actually picks out more grain, and x265 is a much smoother codec. 84 to 8. 26*). nearly fifteen years old: If you upgrade your GPU and CPU, it is no longer 15 years old. I've made extensive comparisons with my personal tuning for x265 last year (default tunings for x265/HEVC encoders are not really that good for preserving fine detail) and found out that AV1 washes away more fine low contrast detail than x265 at resonably bitrate levels (which is something difficult to quantify, but equivalent to around CRF 22 HEVC/x265 does well as low bitrates, where there is huge quality loss except for things like anime. 265 is HEVC, so ideally avoid mixing terminology by saying "H. HEVC is not and will likely never be a standard on the web, for example, while AV1 already. 4ghz? The normal H265 takes way too much time so I'd rather avoid that. I want to make a tier list similar to Trash's tier list (WEB 01, 02, 03, bluray 01, 02, 03, etc) but specifically targeted for x265 release groups. 264. Files produced via x265 are HEVC, but not all HEVC/H. A ~5gb x265 encode from Silence or Afm72 or somebody is going to look way better than a ~2gb x264 RARBG or YTS encode. By that measurement I'm guessing either the i5 or i7 would fit my needs, as they are both well over double the existing. So as a general rule, stick to H. In which case transcoding could kind of defeat the purpose but proxies are always an option. Over the next year or two the GPUs will go from hardware decoding AV1 to also encoding. There are definitely test clips where vp9 scores higher on metrics but generally x265 does better from what I’ve seen. Devices that don't support HDR likely don't support this particular variant of x265 even if they claim x265 support. Small terminology note, H. The latter had a video bitrate of around 2000 kbps. H265 is much more complex than H264 and so is very heavy on the CPU. H265 is the codec, X265 is your processor’s encoder which can only encode h265. That being said, release groups usually encode their HEVCs at lower bitrates than their AVCs (small size RARBG 1080p x264 VS small size RARBG 1080p x265, for example). Thought it was bad wifi signal, so bought a CC Ultra second hand, as that thing doesn't seem to be sold anymore. My settings for DVD rips are the following: x265 encode CF 20 Medium speed (448kbps AC3 passthru audio) This results in a ~180mb 22 minute episode. (AMD) or (NVENC) or (QSV) are hardware encoders built into your GPU. 4MB vs 67. HEVC has gained quite the traction in the past few years and there are very many good releases. As for x264 vs x265, these are software projects that are fairly widely used in programs like FFmpeg or HandBrake. H. Or check it out in the app stores h265 main VS h265 main10 . Ive found it to be a good sweet spot. So a 2gb movie at x265 is much better quality than 2gb x264 movie. Let's switch to more modern codecs: Welcome X265/HEVC X265/HEVC, Slow, 6Mbps, 2 passes. Almost no 1080p content is encoded in H. 266/VVC is better at all bitrates but is way harder to encode and decode. unRaid, Tdarr, Sonarr, Radarr, and Plex user here. But I did try to work something out for you: In terms of speed at default settings: NVENC > x264 > x265 Bought a CC third gen some time ago, noticed it couldn't handle high resolution movies from my plex server. x265 17RF is the same as AV1 25RF for constant quality, assuming all other settings the same, and speed set to medium (x265) and 5 (AV1) No and it's not even close. Will HEVC still require more battery life than AVC, or are the differences in such a situation minimal? My situation: I'm trying to decide between using HEVC 10-bit or traditional x264 for video playback on my Galaxy S10 considering storage capacity is not a problem, but battery life is. NVENC 10bit HEVC x265 encoding . Something labeled as HEVC or h265 usually means it is not encoded, but a raw remux or webdl. Hi, I want to convert a bunch of 4K h264 videos to h265. 84gb with 27. Your point is undermined by the fact you're using x265 settings that are unfavorable to the metrics (time, VMAF) and constraints (size) you're using for comparison; all you've demonstrated so far is that if you configure x265 poorly for your goals, you can get undesirable results. For my usage, I don't do production. How is x265's file size so much smaller and has so much lower bit rate than NVENC? EDIT: I understood the trade-offs between size/quality regarding x265 vs NVENC, and knew NVENC was going to produce a bigger file. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. If you've ever tried to use ffmpeg to convert to/from various formats you will understand the frustration. 264 vs h. 5) between x265 and NvEnc, you need to go from 4. So I use the default 28 on iPhone recordings i've taken, and I bump it up to 30. AV1 software decode can impact battery life on long-form content, And is a lot more likely to drop frames in higher resolutions on less powerful devices. X265 and AV1 don't compare to X264 in visual quality. I tend to do a software x265 test encode of a chapter, and match the filesize with the equivalent compression values using hardware h265 vtb … the resulting filesize is same or smaller, but I can encode dvd at up to 700fps! … HEVC/x265/h. On a pixel level, yes there is loss in detail. They've both the nextgen codecs. 8GB file. At least for me it doesn't work, where h264 works flawlessly. x265 is a program used to encode to h265. Very old hardware can't process x265 to the point that it is irrelevant. RF 22 very slow vs RF 20 fast >> 30. x265 and professional paid software HEVC encoders trash nvenc hevc for example and the reference aomenc trashes the nvenc av1 If you’ve got something that’ll do it, your best bet would be to convert the source to ProRes (even bigger) run it through Topaz, export ProRes from Topaz, then run Handbrake once to convert the 4K ProRes to HEVC (x265). 8 (it's technically still 30, haha) for all Hollywood made movies. 3mb/s bitrate) vs x264 (30. ) are more quality focused and the slower will increase quality and file size. Its not quite a transparent encode, the full remux will still be slightly better, but a 5gb HEVC copy will look better than Netflix usually at least. The x265 project is based on the x264 code so they're very similar to one another, though obviously they implement different encoding. H265 NVENC vs. HEVC in itself is supposed to provide almost minimal loss of quality while reducing the size drastically. NVenc is a hardware encoder (uses dedicated encoding hardware on GPU), and is designed mostly for screen recording/streaming, and so speed is its main objective. If you are wondering what value this provides, HEVC encoding offers a better quality video at the same bit rate, allowing for a higher quality video over the same HEVC is h265 which is not the same as x265. 265, and once my research has finished I'm gonna actually publish a paper and I will post it all over reddit so that people can read the paper and see what the various settings will give them and so forth. so it takes shortcuts and requires a higher bitrate to store the same quality image as x265. QXR makes larger size encodes using HEVC. I'm trying AV1 level 5 (which is a lot slower). 44gb with 28. The one caveat is HDR which is x265 Main 10. They run on the CPU. In the literal big picture, a 50% avg bitrate loss on HEVC encode is usually unnoticeable to most in terms of quality, and most TVs today add some level of post processing to make up that difference, though some are bad at it. My existing processor has a passmark of 1688 and I'm getting about 50% of real-time transcoding. AV1 SVT 10-bit at the same RF and level six got me a 20. You can have a better quality with a preset slow CRF20 than a veryfast CRF18 for example (I didn't test these values it's just for the explanation). So how do you guys stream HEVC/x265/h265 with ffmpeg? I find it hard to discount x265 though, as the space savings are very impressive for very little quality drop (3GB vs 600MB for a single TV episode). HEVC". 264 for 1080p content, and stick to 4K remuxes. Try to use H265 and AVI as the live broadcast bit rate. 264 and H. AV1 is the new emmerging standard but from the review i've read; AV1 is only better at 1900bps or lower. Switching to H265 NVEnc is twice faster, and the file size is about 1/3 smaller. Yes. 0MB vs 30. nVidia before 9th gen has none, 9th & 10th gen only do 4:2:0 and only the 16/20/30 series Now for the CRF 18 it's just an indicator of the quality for the SAME settings. Google searching tells me also RTMP is not an option. 265" "h265" and "MeGusta" as 4 separate terms in my sonarr profile search. Not sure why X265 behave like this, will better preset But after checking about media servers like Jellyfin and emby, I was pretty impressed. I was purposely hunting for high banding shots to test differences and came across this case which is more about clarity and detail. They are usually encoded optimised for streaming already, and I don't want to loose any more quality doing a second re-encoding on them. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS NvEnc h265 Vs x265 (GPU vs CPU HEVC) Depends on the encoder implementation. 265 (AKA HEVC) standard. If it is H264, it must be at least 12000. So 4k is 4 times as big a resolution Sep 27, 2024 · x265 is a specific software encoder for H. Preset stuff when it comes to quality and file size with HEVC/x265. Only YOU can decide what CQ number looks ok to your eyes. This is purely anedoctal but I was just testing H265 10bit vs H265 with NVENC on my 3070 and the file size for a two hour movie was around 2GB larger with NVENC but it did complete about 3x faster than H265 10bit. a command line) such as WinFF I've run a few test encodes with HB 1. X265 CPU - Whats the current state of play? Hi all, whats the current general opinion/state of play when it comes to H265 encoding, especially for 4K video. Typically you'll want to match quality or file size to get a reasonable point of comparison. I have Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in 4K, a MakeMKV rip. HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding) is just another name for the H265 standard. I mean, hevc/x265 encoded anime like the ones by judas or reaktor look quite good despite being like 1/5th the size. You can also use svt with preset 4 or 5 and be much more efficient than x265. For x264 web-rips, I don't bother re-encoding them. The higher the quality of your original video the less advantage h265 make. As a result so many people and trackers looked down on H265 encodes for a long time. Not that I'm aware of, I've uploaded in H265 and it doesn't work for me also I spoke to their partner support / forums and they said they don't support HEVC H265 and don't plan on. and thats Nvenc H265. Given most devices that run Chrome have a HW HEVC decoder, but most don't have an AV1, HEVC is really the best codec to use in browsers too, now. Without hardware support it's not going to see much adoption. The files do not have HDR. On the other hand, AV1, Opus codecs and MKV, WEBM containers are completely free and open source. But Sonarr recognises all these, and I'm not really sure why. Some say theres a huge quality loss converting h264 to h265. HEVC gives you better quality at lower bitrates. And at lower bitrates, the fidelity is pretty much indistinguishable. He/she/it does 4K and RM4K and 1080p and everything always in HEVC x265. For example, HEVC(x265) is motion based, meaning that it saves space by monitoring stationary pixels. 265, not on the features of x264 vs x265. At least around 1500kbit/sec with 2-pass/3-pass (AV1 uses 3 pass). 265 is the standard (the "rules" of the format), x265 is a software encoder that conforms to those rules. H264 > HEVC > VP9 > AV1 For Quality to Size Efficiency: AV1 > VP9 > HEVC > H264 For lower bitrates, VP9 is worse than HEVC but still slower. 264 vs. I know this was pretty strait forward with x264 but I've read many times that x265 presets (fast, med, slow, etc. But HEVC is pretty well-supported on certain hardware devices like phones. So x265 is software that encodes video to the H. 264 is more widely compatible than H. 264 is AVC and H. H265 is fine for any player on the same local network as the client. ) u/Kichigai has exactly what you need - the ability to convert the h265 via FFMPEG. less stutter but still couldn't render 4K streams. I find this advice does NOT apply to x265 encoding. The code rate value is recommended to be 10000. Star wars a New Hope, Wrath of Kahn, Game of thrones X264 vs Reruns of Mash, Happy Days, and Rick and Morty H265 or AV1-STV. 4MB RF 20 very slow vs RF 18 fast >> 45. Similarly, the x264 software encodes video to H. But, realistically your biggest impact on quality is going be your Topaz settings. x265 is used widely in production. Even with an i9 10980XE, encoding a 2 hour 4K video takes a day at a time on CPU at the slow preset. H265/HEVC is a video codec. The choice between them should be based on h. It's actual software. I have tried streaming Naruto Shippuden and Wonder Woman 1984, both in 1080p x265. x265 10-bit is a bit better though if you’re looking for compression and smaller file size. 9fps on slower. 86Mb/s (183%). Once that happens AV1 will become “real”. 265 can be hard on old HW to decode on the fly so run some test footage through your main device first. I have a Ryzen 5900x and I still get roughly 2fps on the x265 10-bit veryslow preset and 3. Plus the x264 copy doesnt include any featurettes, the x265 copy might. H265 has to be transcoded to H264. Its not a miracle, its not a panacea, but real world you can expect a well encoded ~5-7gb x265 copy to be comparable in quality to an ~8-10gb AVC copy. (yep, i know that it was different preset, but still) Ok, let's give it more bandwidth: X265/HEVC, Slow, 8Mbps, 2 passes. Use ProRes, DNXHR, GoProCineform for editing. there is a difference. AOMedia Video 1 (AV1) is an open, royalty-free video coding format initially designed for video transmissions over the Internet. NVENC is nvidia’s encoder which can only encode h264. Well, honestly, I don't think I've ever noticed any quality loss with H264 at all. Replacing H264 for H265 saves a ton of space even at 1080p. Basically its taking say 1080 and making it look very close to 720 and taking forever to do it. I'll try to explain it as simply as possible. 265/HEVC by distributors. 265 decode. Chrome added HEVC decoder passthrough in the fall. And the point of x265 was that you get the same quality at around half the bitrate compared to x264, so there's a lot of bandwidth and disk space savings. Interframe vs Infraframe codecs: “There are intraframe and interframe codecs. HEVC scales better with higher resolution. I don't know how its quality is. When transcoding with ffmpeg the file size shrinks to between 1/2 and 1/3 of the original (using the plugin "Tdarr_Plugin_075a_FFMPEG_HEVC_Generic"). Also known as HEVC. I have "HEVC" "x265" "x. Just remember that you're compressing to reduce file size and reach transparency in normal viewing -- pixel peeping at still images of in-motion scenes is NOT how people normally watch movies. "Hardware Support Here's a quick rundown of well-known hardware that includes dedicated HEVC decoding blocks, which definitely support efficient HEVC playback: Only Kodi has this issue playing only HEVC (x265) files. SOME shows gets H264 for like a day, then will auto replace with a 265 as they get re-encoded. 264 vs H265, mp4 vs mkv? Help Am I right to store/play my videos in H. HEVC compresses better. Also X264 if set right will give near same file size as X265 with far better quality. The ONLY significant difference is time, with the intel cutting down the time by half to more. Some recommend only transcoding 4k content or BR remux's to h265. If something is labeled as x265 is it encoded. x265 and NvEnc PSNR versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc SSIM versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc VMAF versus bitrate So first take out, is that SSIM, PSNR and VMAF are not consistent within each-others. If there is a lot of movement in a scene (action or sci-fi) then it might look a bit weird if one group of pixels doesn't move with the rest of A common misconception is that a slower preset results in a smaller file. X265 default is 28, and they recommend +/- 2 given personal taste. But if you connect remotely, and need to reduce the quality for smoother playback, your server is gonna work harder. 1mb/s bitrate). 8MB Maybe there is a tiny quality difference I don't see, so the better quality must be with the slower encode, regardless of RF value, right? HEVC was a standard at that time. I am running the most recent Kodi (Aura skin) on Windows 10. In fact, your CPU also has an inbuilt HEVC decoder which makes a big difference. 265 (HEVC) is an amazing codec. GPUs with NVENC support can encode H. Functionally they seem to be identical. Is this the usual target or is it higher than normal? It depends on how much you notice. There are other implementations that are NOT free and must be licensed like the ones used on Blu-Ray discs. the "x265" ones, generally when it starts with x, means it's the software encoding based encoder, using your CPU to render. I though encoding to x265 was much more slower and difficult than x264 so how do reaktor and judas and other mini encoders put out so many anime at such good quality? HEVC (x265) is better in all regards except as people have said it requires modern hardware. cqr knjo nmyykk hduj xcka txibnjo diodqnz bnwhlfj gorqaxqq tgxw