Was ww2 inevitable reddit. The development of the atomic bomb was inevitable.

Was ww2 inevitable reddit They even covered up shortcomings in the plan so Hitler would go along with them. We sent 550k troops to Vietnam. Eisenhower turned down this idea, and the Cold War with all of its proxy wars is what followed. There's still the Soviets to contend with, but if you can keep Lenin from going there then maybe Imperial Russia can manage a relatively peaceful transition to a constitutional Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. this conflict is its own entity. r/NoStupidQuestions. Without Hitler, Nazis wouldn't stand and would probably fall and be replaced by some sort of republic or something. I know that some of our critics have sounded off that somehow we haven't exacted enough vengeance. The whole idea of the great space is related to the realization that the US and its literally awesome industrial capacity was a potent potential enemy to the Reich and the whole war plan was drawn up Well, #1 it's probably not their borders, they're probably s Only administrated by France and the border us gurded by the French military, everything else might just be self governed #2 France wouldn't get that much stronger, but what it It would stumble along until WW2. later on, landing boats can open towards the beach when they already have some covering fire. The Japanese had created the concept of Kantai Kessen. If WW2 doesn't kill the idea of "Imperialism is good" television definitely will. They did not. This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast Related Topics History meme History History comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A dickgirlhasapeedick • Additional Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. arrived and then they could (with luck as an integral part of plan) fight their way to a settlement. and as for your comment, I have no clue what the hell you're saying. If they join the axis in WW2 then their fucked once America joins. Psychiatric casualties are as inevitable as gunshot and shrapnel wounds. the invention of the atomic bomb was inevitable. WhatsApp Cite This Work. Many of the founding fathers thought so. without which trench warfare is all but inevitable. Etc etc. This is more the latter. So not destroying the carriers was not the end of WW2 for Japan. That's one of the reason the Germans were so successful in the early stages of the war, the Soviets were sending huge amounts of resources to the Ruhr, and even gave them a base Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. After defeating the Germans, Patton wanted to March straight to Russia and fight the communists, because they already had the forces ready to go, and he felt like that fight was inevitable anyway. But the Entente wouldn't have been able to impose a peace harsh enough, since, unlike WW2, they didn't completely occupy Germany and force an unconditional surrender. WW2 in Europe wasn't inevitable, if Germany had stopped at Sudetenland or Austria. Hence he argues that the Nazis power was tapping into the powers of antisemitism that already existed. Germany, led by Adolf "The Feathered Führer" Hitler, swooped into Poland, causing quite the flap. When WW2 breaks out in 1939, I would not intervene in favor of the allies. Share Sort by: Best. The Russian railroad magnate Ivan Bloch wrote a huge set, The Future of War, describing that the time they lived in was a time like no other. Bulgaria, Germany, Turkey & Hungary France has more will to fight, enough so that if France from this scenario was in our ww2 it would have lasted a whole year against Germany. How much differently (if at all) do you believe nuclear weapons would be morally perceived by the average American, if instead of Japan, the atomic bombs were dropped on Germany at the end of WW2? I'm interested in hearing your thoughts, both in Well, how about this, duckling? World War II was like a flock of ducks gone quackers! It all started when some feathers got ruffled in 1939. and that street to street fighting did not go very well for the Germans in WW2, but a more successful Barbarossa might have resulted in or threatened the Vietnam is a much different situation. Depends on what criteria you mean by "worst". Members Online [r/imaginarymaps] Alternative WW2 ending in wh9ch Italy defeats Nazi Germany before it can expand and the Allies, along with Poland, Spain, Finland, Ireland For 50 years before WW2, the US still was the #1 country in the world as far as economy is concerned, we just didn't have anything close to the military we had post-WW2 for power projection. The Marian Reforms didn't create this situation; they were a response to it. Sort by: Was WW2 inevitable? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. By June 1st Hitler was dead, Joseph Goebbels was dead, Heinrich Himmler was dead, Martin Bormann was dead. I really hate historical determinism (thinking that no matter what, events will end up a certain way, like Marxist history which sometimes reads all history as working toward a classless society). Well, vengeance isn't the name of the game. And if not in the USA, then GB or SU (SU most likely) would have developed the bomb first. Soviets spent entirety of 30s trying to organize strong antifascist coalition. The constitution put a 20 year moratorium on the issue of slavery to put it off to a time when the country would be strong enough to endure it. I cannot accept that WW2 was anything less than a tragic suicidal plunge into genocidal mania. LinkedIn. Second, a major contributor to the war was the telegraph. If you're a Nazi though, fuck off. what if ww2 upvote r/Hellsing. What do you think redditors? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. What if Germany had never declared war on the United States Was WWII inevitable? The problem is that WWII was not a single conflict until long after hostilities had mushroomed and amalgamated by 1942. Those who knew the most about what Germans had done - the atrocities in the east, the Holocaust, the slave labour (and they were many) knew that retribution was inevitable in defeat and clung to hope that wonder weapons or Hitler's cunning or something - anything - would save them until the end. And For the US, it is even more hazy. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Germany had just spent six years revving up its arms industry, and the 'machinery density' of the Wehrmacht was quite impressive and superior to the Red Army's until the Make the terms of the WW1 armistice less punitive, have the US implement a proto-Marshall Plan afterwards, then even with Hitler alive and kicking you might avoid WW2. Assume Germany unified as they did WW2 determined who would dominate the world for the next century, possibly even several centuries. He knew the Russians used scorched earth tactics and that once winter hit it was an absolute death sentence - so he delayed the Russian invasion and the inevitable happened. first, the military historians who've built the disciplines are obstinate creatures. If you're a liberal (not in the "I hate Republicans" sense) then the differing ideologies of the USA and USSR drove the Cold War forward and the rhetoric of mutual exclusion between the two was sufficient to make the Cold War The only reason we even had a WW2 was because of how poorly we handled the aftermath of the first. A large scale mobilisation designed to resolve Japanese interest in north China via military force was now inevitable. These were not play-soldiers, they were battle hardened veterans of numerous battles with the Japanese in southeast Asia, and were familiar with modern warfare. Or check it out in the app stores   If there is a WW2 it's around containing Soviet influence. Without Japan going on its imperial endeavors in WW2, I could totally see there being fewer casualties overall in the war (with at least one front being completely derailed), though it'd almost certainly be a darker timeline for Asia (there would most likely be no developed country in Asia by the 21st century). 1, was trying to invade and cripple the Soviet Union before winter as the USSR had far more conscripts to throw at any invader and ended up with a two fronts war. Even assuming that holding Moscow would have made any difference at all (it didn't at Stalingrad). Even if we stalemated in Japan and even if Britain I think after WW2 he's moved them to the banks of the Moskva. Or check it out in the app stores   In a war such as WW2, which relied so heavily on industrial output and weight of numbers, the idea of a "turning point" is a little antiquated. Hitler wasn't the sole agitator in WW2. By 1940, the FDR administration felt it was inevitable that the USA was going to be involved in a war with the Axis powers. To which degree differs. Answers must be in-depth and comprehensive, or they will be removed. Getting the oilfields back online after they were inevitably blown up, then producing usable oil, then getting it back to Germany was basically impossible. Japan was still hoping to win the second or later fleet battle (which they nearly did) and hope the Americans would want peace. . please use a reddit quote for the symbol next time. Since the Russo-Japanese War, the Japanese and Americans had saw each other as possible if not inevitable enemies in the Pacific. Eisenhower as well after WW2 Nixon was also absolutely determined to become President. First, I'm glad we had ww1 and ww2. Liberal democracy and totalitarianism are so diamatrically oppossed that armed conflict is without question. Was WW2 inevitable? (PRIVATE FOR REDDIT API PROTEST) Members Online. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. Even our victory is tainted by dropping nuclear weapons on civilian centers. Once the bombing happened were most people on board with entering WW2? TIL that there exists real footage of one of the most unethical psychological experiments. It seems like everything they do there is the devil's playbook: murder, lies, intrigue, self-deception, bluster, lots of death, economic stagnation, brutal repression, If you want to guarantee its survival early on, Germany would've had to have received less harsh terms in the Treaty of Versailles, or the Entente would've had to occupy Germany in its entirety and assisted in building a new state Further, the Habsburgs armies can't be relied upon to actually fight Germany who's been helping them for years, and unlike Italy in WW2 there's no occupied zone and war leader head of state who can be deposed by legal means to bring the "real" government back in charge. It was more or less inevitable that the axis lost, and it mainly due to resources. I actually have a fairly poor opinion of Japan's performance in WW2. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of time and causality. In a different universe, September 1, 1983 could have marked the start of WW3. You could say it was when the Allies achieved superiority in material production, or you could make the argument that opening the second front (Russia) was the end of their chances. I think the only way is if D day was less successful either because it was detected or overlord was not bought in by the OKW and AH. It is also true that, after a period of recession from mid-1945 to mid-1947, the US economy specifically began to grow prodigiously. War was inevitable in the sense that it was always Hitler’s intention to invade. When discussing the links between the end of World War One and the beginning of World War Two, Daniels, Robert C. I doubt imperial Germany would start another world war, they aren't ideologically motivated to exterminate and repopulate like the Nazis were. I still think “Gates of Moscow ‘41 is turning point of WW2” is still a valid view. K. Top Was WW2 inevitable? Is there a Cold War mod that lets Germany remilitarize and attempt to retake pre-WW2 borders? Doesn't really matter what point before WW2, nor does Russia, France, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Greece & Romania V. Obviously this directly led to WW2. the US not really caring that the Soviets took Eastern Europe or the USSR being That's an important thing to stress because it had a deep impact in French preparations for another inevitable war. A collection of posts mentioning Ireland from all over Reddit. What really defined WW2 was its scale. He mentions the defensive power of high fire-rate weapons, like the machine gun but also the bolt-action rifle. 90K subscribers in the HistoricalWhatIf community. Best. I've read (in articles I can no longer locate) that the main difference between the treaties of WWI and WWII was that the Treaty of Versailles was punitive in nature, which directly led to Hitler's rise and Nazi Germany; while the treaties that ended WWII sought to make the economies of Axis nations interdependent with their victor's economies- thereby Invading the USSR was inevitable, Stalin was planing to invade Romania (Germany’s biggest oil supply) and Germany was running low on oil (something the Soviets has in abundance) so a war between the two was only a matter of time, in fact, by attacking early and by surprise Germany had better chances of defeating the USSR. Loads of WW2 documentaries are Eurocentric and fail to properly cover the war in Asia, but this is one of the worst offenders. Milosevic then fanned the flames into an inferno for personal political power. Had the war ended in a peace drawn more from mutual attrition, do you think this may have staved off WW2 completely? Or was WW2 still an inevitable reality for the future regardless if the US entered the war or not? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I'd imagine the most reasonable WW1 alternate scenarios involve Germany or My opinion on the subject is that by the time of the October Revolution and the American entry into war, guaranteeing 1) an Entente victory and 2) an uneasy, flawed peace WW2 was about the ideological battle of Fascism vs Bolshevism and creating "Lebensraum" for the German people in the east. I’m not sure if Austria-Hungary was inevitably gonna get dragged in every scenario but pretty much the Western Front was always inevitable, and the Russians and Germans on the East. The Soviets actually applied to JOIN the Axis in 1940, and were actively fueling Hitler's war machine. If they stay neutral/join the allies late in the war then I can see the ottomans surviving up to the present For discussion of all things World War II. Predestination paradox: In the 1920’s Hitler was shown allied victory footage from 1945 like out of The Man In The High Castle (show) he then set about to prevent it by making the party to take over Germany and create the Third Reich and try to destroy all the other neighboring countries thereby causing the events in our history which he wanted to prevent. But from the moment the reparations were set and the maps were redrawn, there was going to be another massive european conflict, and Germany was going to be one of the belligerent powers. Reddit. Without it, the long peace may never have happened. This isn't to say the cold war was inevitable, as u/saxonjf wrote it could have evolved into a hot war right away or one side could have acquiesced to the others demand (e. A couple of states declared their independence around that time (such as Estonia late in '88). The only way the US would have lost in WW2 was if Japan or Germany had managed to invade and take out its Industrial Unlike WW1 where alternate history always ends in War, with the same folks on the same side. The freshly landed Americans certainly helped give the Allies some momentum in the Hundred Days (though still, both the British and French Armies vastly outnumbered the number of Americans in the theater) but after failing to achieve victory in the spring 1918 the war was inevitably going to end in German defeat. Not the victims are the subject of it in western society but the perpretators that now seem to be cathartically cleansed from it. Pacific Fleet to the point that they could consolidate their gains in Southeast Asia (they also attacked Hong Kong and Malaya almost simultaneously) before the U. Better wording: Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. This of course reveals an interesting moral question which is whether Paul and Leto II are morally justified in their efforts? The jihad and subsequent events led to Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. r/ww2. In general, giving your enemy no way out is the worst strategy there is. g. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS Go to ww2 r/ww2. This could hamper Lebansraum. This reddit will mostly focus on the original Hellsing manga series and its prequel "The Dawn," and the Was WW2 inevitable? This reddit will mostly focus on the original Hellsing manga series and its prequel "The Dawn," and the "Ultimate" anime series. " Researcher John W. Regardless of how much of the Wermacht would have been stationed in the east, the shear numbers 29,000,000 and still mobilizing more were impossible for the Germans to meet. All replies must be a genuine effort to answer the question helpfully; joke answers are not allowed. Only with Nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons on a whole new level that none of us could imagine. But given how infamous Hitler is people will say things like “if he just got accepted to art school” or “if he died while serving” it could have been avoided. People like Calhoun had to thoroughly poisoned the well that the slavocracy was unwilling to budge on anything related to slavery. reddit/r/history seeks to find the reasons for the defeat of France in 1940 by referring to the size of its At the start of WW2 they had a virtual decade of technological head start and were able to dominate and overpower Its the conformity experiment from Stanley Milgram and was conducted after the atrocities of WW2. However, the Germans were able to mobilize their forces again and battled the Soviets in Kursk in the following year. honestly, knowing the fascist movement and the actual situation on the ground. They carried on with the fight even after hopelessly lost in hope of forcing the Allies to accept this. Russis never really posed a threat to Japan in terms of being able to invade the home islands (unless maybe given US support in the form of landing craft and such, even though I'm not sure they'd be able to pull off much of an amphibious invasion), but we might see some of By 1988 it was pretty much inevitable. ” Military History Online. This is because the Japanese government has never fully apologised for starting, escalating, and continuing a war that killed over 20 million Its not inevitable but it is preferable, at least from Paul and Leto II's perspective. Without the trauma of WW2, sure people would be much more willing to support imperialism, but as more and more colonial uprisings happen during the 60s This isn't like anything. The 2 main thesis statements of Mein Kampf were the conquest of the Soviet Union for Lebensraum and the murder of Was this really inevitable? Is Nazis winning the cold war against America impossible? Like what would happen if say most of the world turned to a Nazi tilted non-aligned movement like otl's NAM(where a majority were socialists of some kind who didn't want to associate with the USSR directly, Nehru, Nasser, Tito, Nkrumah etc etc). the major figures of military history are academics with connections to present military 140K subscribers in the ww2 community. He also said maaaaany times that Kaiser Wilhelm II’s big mistake was trying to fight a two front war - only to then proceed to start a 2 front war. By about 1939, WWII was certainly seen as inevitable. You have the drawing up of Europe between the western allies and soviets before the war was over. Or check it out in the app stores   Mussolini's Triumph: How italy Won WW2 (1935-2023) Post-1900s Share Add a Comment. Germany had long since been rearming, while France and Britain were doing the same essentially from the Munich Crisis (1938) WW2 was inevitable. That’s inevitably the interesting part Hi*ler would've died a few months after WW2 or at most a couple of years. Tldr: the first battle of 1914 were likely the worst as germany/France/Russia used up their best soldiers/shells /bullets in the first few months to try to achieve a decisive victory before falling back Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Hitler dies in a trench, someone else would have risen in his place. Locked due to reddit protests, until the 14. READ FAQs before posting! 18+. For your historical what if needs! Before WW2, the Indian army consisted of 200,000 men. It was just a question of who did it first. As long as the UN keeps its power along with key power countries, like the US, UK, Germany, France, Canada, etc, I believe a war is still at risk but not inevitable. Reminder that Nazi economics were basically one big Ponzi scheme, so an economic crash from not doing constant warfare seems inevitable by the early 50s. To me the answer depends on some conditions. However, I would be supporting resistance movements in French and British colonies which would Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on a big gamble that they could damage the U. Best hope for them was to be using that oil by 1944, but realistically that oil wouldn't have been enough until 1945/46 at the earliest with Germany's industrial capacity. Not sure if that makes it inevitable though. War in Europe was inevitable, there was not a single event that played a central role. No lend lease will be sent out to Britain, France, or the Soviet Union. A professor made an analogy comparing Germany's WW1 and WW2 armies: WW1 was the natural, all around athlete, whose body has been honed by years and years of rigorous training of the body and the mind. and the post-war world order was both inevitable and necessary. Its the conformity experiment from Stanley Milgram and was conducted after the atrocities of WW2. I think if you want to avoid the entire showdown you would have to go back to the early Republic years and somehow convince Thomas Jefferson to put his money where his mouth was. Or check it out in the app stores   Did the typical American see WW2 as inevitable? America only truly entered WW2 after the bombing at Pearl Harbor. Or was another major war after WW1 inevitable even if Adolf Hitler and the Nazis never took power in Germany? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The thing is Yugoslavia did have all of these tensions from WW2 and earlier under the surface, though they had died down to that a of simmering embers. discredited their 'peace faction' under 54 votes, 17 comments. Which will draw Germany into another war against Italy/Russia/France/UK that will be WW2 with a As soon as Corporal Hitler came to power in 1933 that is when WW2 became inevitable. The IJA believed that it could resolve the crisis in north China quickly, estimating it would need three months, three divisions, and JP 100 million to force Chiang to the negotiating table and secure the resources of north In 1950 someone was absolutely certain that WW3 was inevitable and would begin prior to 1960. BUT!, there was also two factors that absolutely doomed the Nazis to loose. The Soviet Union was after all a very autocratic and repressive regime under Stalin (will get progressively better after him) but in the key years to define where one The Allies gained intelligence showing that the Germans had planned an attack on France similar to that of WWI (this intelligence proved faulty, as the Germans changed their plan and instead launched a risky tank assault through the Ardennes Forest), and they prepared to defend against it, but it was not until the German invasion of France in Japan saw all that, plus the looming threat of the Soviets right next door, and feared that its own subordination was inevitable without action. Something as calamitous as those wars is the only way atomic bombs can be comprehended by mankind (a semi domesticated mammal that recently stumbled out of the forest). Or check it out in the app stores the Japanese characters treat WW2 as a tragic but inevitable mistake with no value judgements involved. Was WW2 inevitable? Yet, according to Toland, they all thought that the war with the US was inevitable, in fact the argument was "better to attack now, in 1941", when they thought they still had a chance, than wait and get attacked in 2-3 years by the domineering US. 5 million. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS WW2 was not trench warfare because Hitler utilized a new style of combat which did not rely on attrition and trench-style warfare, rather quick movements and mobile attacks. Poland would have given up the path to the sea if Britain didn’t give them the war However, making the peace much, much harsher would indeed have stopped Germany from attacking again. youtube The numbers suggest that a Soviet victory was inevitable. The four Panzer Groups lacked the necessary infantry strength to make tight encirclements, yet, in a way, the Germans were damned if they do and damned if they don't: loose encirclements permitted an insurgency to form, while tight Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS as soon as the tank rush starts to fail loss is inevitable. Franz what i want to know is, why do the landing boats open facing the beach rather than open facing away, or facing parallel to the beach. The establishment of complex and interconnected treaties/alliances pulled nations The Holocaust didn’t start until 1941. Or check it out in the app stores   We are closer to 2100 than 1945, the end year of WW2. In fact, an unofficial and undeclared war was already happening in the northern Atlantic Ocean with significant military casualties happening during the summer of 1941 (before Pearl Harbor). Their attacks on European colonies were masterly led and fought; but there is no way on earth those would have succeeded if the other countries weren't dealing Japan was willing to accept a harsh conditional surrender such as what was imposed upon Germany after World War One. Or check it out in the app stores   But did the Japanese government/officers/soldiers realize that this was in fact the beginning of the inevitable? Or did that moment come at a later date? I mean, in retrospect the result seems obvious to us, but after such rapid expansion I walk a fine line on this issue. Reply reply More replies [deleted] Was WW2 inevitable? Could anyone have stepped forward and successfully restarted the war in a meaningful manner after June 1st, probably not. So the defeat in front of Moscow was also inevitable. 25K subscribers in the ww1 community. Hellsing-related con/showings/news and discussions on the work/life of I am trying to make a realistic scenario where ww2 don't happen or at least doesn't involve Germany and Western Europe as the main battle field, but I have a lot of doubts since I want it to be the more plausible possible. Another argument for virulent antisemitism is the post ww2 view on it that holds to this day. Hitler was not inevitable. And here's where it gets interesting. A stable supply of raw materials, along with a very different government, might stop the invasion of China. Or check it out in the app stores   Was WW2 inevitable? If the Nazis supported the Jews, would they have won WW2? comments. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS So WW2 was a blessing in disguise. Please remember that all comments must be helpful, relevant, and respectful. nonetheless, their practice is evidence of why it can't and won't change. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS the Germans might have either won or forced a negotiated peace treaty. September 1, 1939 marks the day Hitler invaded Poland and the official start of WW2. The communists were like the fascists, in that both factions presumed war with the conflicting ideology was to all intents inevitable. Please read the rules before participating, as we remove all comments which break the rules. Or check it out in the app stores     The interpretation of WW2 history that I was taught is that WW2 is really an extension of WW1. Keep in mind that Japan itself is also largely barren of industrial resources, to the point that the US' embargo in response to their Manchuria/China aggression meant they would actually run oil dry This defensive ring would house airfields, torpedo boat- and submarine bases, all so that when the inevitable US reinforcement fleet would come to retake teh Philippines, they could be whittled down, so that a new Decisive Battle like Tsushima would be fought and Japan would emerge victorious and the US would concede like Russia had 1905. No. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets Imagine how inevitable future historians would have claimed a US-Soviet war was if the Cold War had gone hot (assuming civilization survived to have future historians in such it may make sense to teach WWI and WWII together in a generation but it won't be done that way, and for easily identifiable reasons. Was WW2 inevitable? Wow! Is that ever opening a huge can of worms. Industry, and the demand for Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or check it out in the app stores The invasion of Poland is considered the start of WW2 because it actively drew the global powers to war Reply reply The immense disparity in armor and personnel made the end result inevitable, but it was an embarrassment for the Red army. World War I, the Great War, was avoidable but at the same time probably inevitable. r/Hellsing. Prolonging it any longer would have made Here's What You Need to Remember: Both Hitler and Roosevelt believed that war was inevitable, and they were both probably right. Gorby still wanted to keep the Soviet Union relevant, but he adamantly refused to use force to keep any of the breakaway states in line. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS (which WW2 only was to a much lesser extent than WW1). The reality is there's no scenario in which the US loses WW2. Germany had no real chance of winning the war by the time of the Bulge. Finally, the third step would be for all the small states created after the war to engage in a diplomatic balancing with the Soviets and the Germans to ensure their security. The second step would be some more natural and defensible borders to minimize both the rational security concerns and nationalist irredentist feeling that led to WW2. for the USA, WW2 would have been the war in the pacific, Britain & Canada would have gotten dragged into the Pacific War in Burma & Defending Australia. Kantai Kessen had envisioned a USN fleet sailing into Japanese territory and being whittled down by land based aviation and skirmishes before a decisive battle No, just no. No German victory in WW1 is going to stop AH from collapsing. Or check it out in the app stores (plus tanks) themselves were inevitable, making a huge trench warfare an accident of perfect conditions in the 1910s, of being post industrial revolution (so huge armies, good rifles, machine gunes) but pre mechanization and radios (which would Remember that when WW2 started they also didn't call it a world war, it was simply smaller seperate conflicts spiraling out of control. However, if those countries lose their power, reduce their war capabilities, WW3 is inevitable. For the Germans the Soviets probably represented the worst option as already late in WW2 a german would've much preferred to be occupied or taken prisoner by the western allies. It absolutely was not inevitable even though it has often been presented as such. After Stalingrad, defeat was virtually inevitable. The only reason that traditional German operational methods amounted to failure is because of the USSR's vast geographic space. Nazi Germany’s wartime economy relied upon both slave labor and looted food/resources from the countries they were able to overrun. I cannot imagine how anyone could think that the USSR came out of WW2 in a comparable state to how Germany came out of WW1. “Interview of a WW2 Veteran. 2, the loss of their atomic research (smuggled out of Germany Even if the Germans had managed to get troops into Moscow in December 1941 they were so weak in numbers and so far from their logistic support that they could never have held it. Appel went to Italy from May to July, 1944 and spoke with officers about how their men were handling the strain of combat. The US joining the war was not inevitable Another point I read on Reddit some time ago was that the population of many soviet territories they occupied were actually pretty anti-soviet and might even have helped the Germans if they didn’t, you know, exterminate them. To that end the Cold War was inevitable because the USSR had the means to resist this militarily but not economically. I've seen a lot of history books, often intended for use in schools, that simply present it as an inevitable result of WWI without ever elaborating on why but it really doesn't stop there. 40 votes, 24 comments. Barbarossa was inevitable so long as England remained in the war - in fact it kicked off as the last shipments of trade goods arrived from the Soviet Union, a shipment that Germany couldn’t have paid for. In other words, is war generally due to inevitable growing conflict, or are there instances where foreign policies or actors play a key role? Specifically, I was wondering whether or not it looked as though WWII was inevitable, even without Hitler, but I'm curious about any major conflicts. But the Soviets truly did not expect war in 1941. I think by 1860 a crisis was inevitable. Sure there was fighting between Japan and China but Japan had been expanding it's empire since it won the Russo-Japanese war. But the discovery of relativity was quite inevitable. In fact, they encouraged it. Hitler had no intention of invading westward until Britain declared war on Germany. Or check it out in the app stores   What if Hitler just died before WW2 started, including all his landgrabs such as: Austria, Sudetenland. Don't be a scab. By the end of the WW2, it numbered over 2. World War 2 at least had a cause with a fairly clearly defined set of "bad guys" and "good guys" trying to stop them. Example: A logistical study was performed concerning an attack on the USSR, and the result was the army could get 700-800km into Russia, and then supplies would run out, and from there on it would be a stop/start/stop campaign (this is effectively what Any "Fascist bloc" involving Germany and Italy is going to be based on revanchism and that inevitably leads to a major war involving at least France and likely the U. Open comment sort options. Italy could very realistically have achieved an Italian majority in Libya preserving its hold on the country to the present. We had some 12 million mobilized for WW2. The development of the atomic bomb was inevitable. That might be the biggest knock on effect, resulting in more land being taken from China in the end. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS With American industrial might it was pretty inevitable, even if the Japanese didn't want to believe it. It is true that the Great Depression by many measures still had a tight hold on many western economies at the start of 1939 when the “war economy” distortion of WW2 took hold. would simply have kept churning out carriers until the Japanese lost. This doesn't explain the northward push into Norway and Denmark. The Let's say they remain under Franco well Japan invades them and brings Spain into the war the Philippines fairs slightly better slowing down Japan maybe not stopping them but definitely slowing them this tho will probably bring Spain War was inevitable, but it could have been a full decade later. WW2 was a bodybuilder on all kind of drugs. Probably they would see WW1/Weltkrieg as the show up to the world the true german strength and that it's title of great power is here to stay while WW2/Second Weltkrieg as the consolidation of their influence in Europe and the world as if any rebellions that happens on their puppets collapses during the war. Millions of non-combatants dead. "They're in China" is all that is said of the Japanese invasion and occupation of China - none of the battles mentioned (not even the invasion of Nanking). Or check it out in the app stores   (Gadget), so the production of more bombs is pretty much inevitable. We didn't go total war. Only question was wheter Germany will attack east or west. Bring discussion, clips, art, fan art, AMVs, theories, queries and general Hellsing love here. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS So in that respect the collapse of Nazi Germany was inevitable, since the Nazis fear off communism made the invasion of the Soviet Union inevitable, even though the Soviet Union was simply too large to defeat in conventional Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Certainly, but there is an underlying attitude of superiority that many Americans hold when it comes to WW2 (and WW1, for that matter). ‘The Second World War was inevitable from the moment World War One ended’. First, as u/R0cket_Surgeon already mentioned, nobody in power anticipated or even suspected that what would become the Great War could Truman, Churchill and more reluctantly De Gaulle, agree on going through with operation Unthinkable, because through a more pyrrhic D-Day the allied push east is delayed, so the red army successfully takes nearly all of Germany except for the Rhineland, meaning that the USSR holds more leverage in the peace treaty signing, though Stalin in a sign of good will allows for I’m actually in the early stage of getting ideas about this for a book I want to write. To export a reference to this article Invading Belgium was pretty much gonna happen either way as it was the least costly route to defeat the French; so that was always gonna drag England in. Because Hitler's entire plan was to gain living space for the German volk and the Nazi doctrine As a great “what-if” among history enthusiasts and the alternate history community alike, I’m asking if another world war post-WW1 was They say the two greatest things Bismarck did was 1) unify Germany and 2) make Great Britain and France BFFs. Not the OP, but it’s a bit more complicated than that. Stalingrad is arguably thought of as the biggest and bloodiest battle during the second World War, and most say after the battle, loss was inevitable for the Germans. War between Russia and Germany was always inevitable. grind down the allies through France, and if valkyrie was successful and the SS were taken out by the Wehrmacht and that’s highly unlikely as Germany was so screwed Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Not like Iraq, not like Afghanistan, not like Vietnam, not like the Cold War. This reminds me of WW2 mobilization. Kristallnacht was in November of 1938, and is generally considered to be the first big event of the Holocaust. Pound for pound the country was pretty formidable but by the end of the day they simply didn't have the heavy industry to compete with other powers. If you modmail asking for access I'll ban you. Same with many other discoveries. there was a sense in the Third Reich that war with the Americans was inevitable, both for WW2? It was inevitable. Well, it’s possible that colonization didn’t go as planned. The precise form World War II took was not inevitable. Many historians claim that WW1 was bound to happen given rising tensions in Europe. I will accept that WW2 ended with the good guys winning. true. The Romans had simply run out of small landholders to fill their legions; the country had long been in the process of dividing into two distinct classes, of wealthy senators and nobles on one side, and landless plebeians and slaves on the other. Of course, even if the Japanese had won a later fleet battle, the U. Wording is important when reading the tone of an online forum, and I deciphered it as such. that way, they can still run out as fast as they can, but they wont get slaughtered the moment the door opens. The Portal for Public History. This leads to a further point of the clash of personalities and infiltration of politics into the allied forces due to the belief in Germany and japans inevitable defeat. I deny that historical events ever work toward specified ends, but at the same time I think it's important to remember that history doesn't operate based on the But I have a very hard time thinking of WW2 as anything but extremely horrible. It shows a real participant truly believing that he's conforming to killing another subject. And if my limited knowledge of Benjamin Harrison is correct, I believe he was also set on becoming President one day. 10 votes, 38 comments. Sure, it would have taken a bit longer, probably. S. No Gavrilo Princip kicking of the chain of events that starts ww1? something else would inevitably have done it. But this ignores that the Nazi's and a lot of WW2 were shaped by rather specific beliefs of Hitler. It's possible, but we have to remember that alliances between the Nazis and the acceptable center-right were based on a reasonable fear of communism and radical left politics. bqpp fxguxl wab igeeo vpoxyfo hkebm scofhwxs iji rsym grozk